While the Aliens Act and its Regulation states that all detainees in CIEs should have access to legal advice assisted by a translator, this is not always the case as has been reported by various institutions including the Spanish Attorney General’s Office in 2019, Judge Diez Tejera in 2020, and civil society organisations. This remained the case in several CIEs even after judicial decisions requesting a solution. On 13 July 2018, the Trial Court n°8 in Las Palmas (juzgado de instrucción) insisted that the Ministry of Interior sign an agreement with the Bar Association of Las Palmas for the provision of legal advice. The country also makes use of “ad hoc”—surge or temporary—facilities, which are typically only used during the annual immigration swells in the Canary Islands and the North African enclaves of Melilla and Ceuta.
The Ministry of the Interior released responses to FAQ’s as regards asylum applications. At the moment, it is not possible to apply for asylum given that applications have to be made in person and facilities are currently closed. However, the Ministry has stated that the principle of non-refoulement remains guaranteed protection. In addition, temporary documentation held by asylum seekers, expiring during the state of emergency, is automatically extended until the end of the latter.



An immediate intervention from the State Attorney General was requested and the complaint highlighted the lack of food, lack of medical care and urged the transfer to the hospital of a child with a broken ankle, as detainees are not allowed out. The complaint also reported the conditions inside the Melilla CETI including overcrowding, insufficient showers, bathrooms and hygiene products, lack of laundry facilities and hot water, meaning that lexpats abogado extranjeria sevilla the recommendations to prevent the spread of Covid-19 are not being followed. After the release of immigration detainees from detention centres , there has been considerable discussion on the future of the country’s detention policies. The Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de Andalucía reports that “since CIEs have been closed and detainees released, no catastrophe has ensued” and the organisation urged the country not to re-open the centres.
This form of expedited removal bypasses the intervention of the juridical power, raising concerns about the protection needs of those deported. According to the National Police, the drop in detention numbers was due to the use of improved criteria to assess the need for detention and increased police cooperation with countries of origin and transit. This led to a drop in mass identification controls, from 90,406 in 2011 to 30,306 in 2015.

The reality is that the world is slightly more complex than what I thought when I was 8. It became something like the broken dream that other kids have of becoming professional soccer players or astronauts. So much that only my closest friends and family knew about this. I tried to take small steps that, even without knowing it at the moment, would make me be a little bit closer to Silicon Valley. Improve my English, study abroad, learn everything I could about product development… Finally, destiny brought me to Silicon Valley.
This measure was adopted due to the conditions of overcrowding and the impossibility of maintaining distance between detainees in the centre. Reports indicate that there remain approximately 100 persons in CIE’s throughout Spain for a total of 866 spaces, with most detainees being held in the Canary Islands. Lavanguardia has reported since the closure of CIEs in Spain, departure points of boats carrying migrants have been changed as Morocco was maintaining strict confinement of its population, making it hard for boats to leave. Boats are currently leaving from Algeria and arriving in Almeria, Murcia, and Baleares. While at the end of 2018, the Spanish ombudsman reported that of the 7,855 people detained in Spain’s CIE, 2,801 were Moroccan nationals and 2,513 were Algerian nationals, at present, Algerian nationals are the largest population arriving by boat to Spain.

As it developed the Children's Conventions, the Hague Conference transformed itself and international family law. Cooperation based upon the most recent conventions entails the appointment of Central Authorities in contracting states and the communication between the diverse interlocutors involved in a specific subject. Is the nie number proof of residency I’m a British citizen have a job offer in Spain but want to bring my wife who is a non eu national. She can apply for a spouse visa once I’m resident in Spain but I was hoping she she join me quickly. I have not heard of any problems in similar cases, but there could be special conditions depending on the non-EU country. Ask the police or civil servants when you apply for your wife’s residency.
BUT when I asked my Spanish embassy about all of this last year, they told me there was nothing more I needed to do after arriving into Spain. So far I’ve left and come back countless times and tomorrow I plan to open a bank account. If you are from a non-European Union country and are married to an European Union citizen,you can apply for Spanish residency without going through a long-term visa. Same here regardingminimum wage and how many months you should be living here before you can apply for residency, just find out at the relevant police station. After you obtain your Spanish residency card, you can register at the Spanish social security to finally have a Spanish health card.
In some jurisdictions it is possible for the mediator to hear a child, with sufficient age and maturity, and for the mediator, when the mediation is not conducted where the child is located, to know and to see the minor, which is likewise significant. Children tend to have technologically savvy and may feel comfortable texting or e-mailing a mediator. But the analysis goes beyond this, because one thing are the violence allegations under the domestic context and other thing are cases of violence in an international context. Chapter 16 refers special issues regarding the use of mediation in non-Convention cases. During 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, there were in the United States -outgoing case statistics- a total of 1022, 941 and 799 new cases of international wrongful child removal or retention, with 1492, 1367 and 1144 minor involved.

While Frontex, the EU’s border agency, reported that by 2018 overall detections of unauthorised border-crossings into the EU had reached their lowest level in five years (“92 percent below the peak of the migratory crisis in 2015,”) between 2017 and 2018, Spain experienced a twofold increase in entries. By 2019, these arrival trends started to decline, from 65,400 in 2018 to 32,500 in 2019; however, asylum requests skyrocketed from 54,050 in 2018 to 117,800 in 2019. Spanish law guarantees civil society access to places of detention, but NGOs claim that they are often denied access. Less than 50 percent of detainees are eventually deported, underscoring the routine practice of detaining non-deportable people and raising questions about whether detention is used as an arbitrary form of punishment. The Ombudsman office also reported that it is monitoring the situation in the country’s prisons to ensure that adequate measures are being implemented to protect the health of prisoners and staff. As of 11 April 2020, 58 prisoners had tested positive for Covid-19.
As of 3 February, 21 detainees were reported to have contracted the virus--a figure that represents 31 percent of the facility’s current population --and one detainee with underlying health conditions has been transferred to hospital for treatment. The Spanish National Police Union in Tenerife has called for Hoya Fría’s immediate closure. Our team is made up of by lawyers who are specialists in immigration law and processing any kind of procedure before the competent authorities to obtain residence and work permits in Spain.

The term “taking parent”, “kidnapping parent” or “parental kidnapper” refers to the parent who is alleged to have wrongfully removed a child from his/her place of habitual residence to another State or to have wrongfully retained a child in another State. To Schuz and Shmueli the issue of compensation for the left-behind parent is necessary and they conclude that the abduction convention model is the preferred model or solution for the left-behind parent107 in spite of the dilemmas this might entail. Such figures already showed an important number of cases involving the United States and Mexico and some reasons for that are the intense contact and border crossing between the two countries, interpersonal relationships, the cultural difference, and the inevitable crisis of family as an institution. When we talk about family, we are referring to a variety of family structures1 obviously including those where there is a separation or divorce and the involvement of both parents with their children should be a top priority, but reality is not so in many cases.